FUND FOR THE ENDOWMENT OF THE DIPLOMATIC RECEPTION ROOMS OF THE DEPT OF STATE Charity Report

Public IRS 990 nonprofit record

FUND FOR THE ENDOWMENT OF THE DIPLOMATIC RECEPTION ROOMS OF THE DEPT OF STATE

EIN 52-1284384 · Arts, Culture & Humanities (A82Z)

What they do

THE FUND for THE ENDOWMENT of THE DIPLOMATIC RECEPTION ROOMS is A SECTION 501(C)(3) PUBLIC CHARITY SUPPORTED BY CITIZENS COMMITTED to THE PRESERVATION of THE DIPLOMATIC RECEPTION ROOMS AS NATIONAL TREASURES. IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE U.S. DEPARTMENT of STATE, THE FUND

Before you give

Should I give to this charity?

Easy charity check

Look at where the money went

Of every $100 spent, about $69.00 was reported for mission work. Use the spending picture below and ask what results that work produced.

Plain answer: A tax form cannot prove that a charity is doing good. It can show how the charity says it spent its money—and point out questions you should ask.

Basic facts we verified

IRS warning checkNo IRS revocation warning appears in this data.

Money report from 2024The charity has a recent tax report to read.

They explain their jobThe charity tells us what it is trying to do.

They name their leaders13 people are listed in the latest report.

You can reach themThey list contact information, so you can ask questions.

Money made simple

75.87%of revenue went to mission work69.0% of expenses · Program services

2.78%of revenue went to fundraising2.5% of expenses

$75.11spent for every $100 of revenueRevenue covered expenses this year.

31.37%of revenue went to management and office costs28.5% of expenses

$13.21in assets for every $1 spent this yearSome assets cannot be spent right away.

22.2%of its money came from giftsOther money may come from services or investments.

Ask these three easy questions

Who did you help? Ask for a recent story or report that shows real results.
What will my money do? Ask exactly what your gift will pay for.
Is this really the charity? Give only through its official website or confirmed phone number.

Bottom line: Do not decide from a name, mission statement, or tax status alone. Look at where the money went, then ask what changed, who was helped, and what your gift will do. YouCanGiveBack does not endorse or grade organizations.

Money

Financial picture

Tax year 2024

A plain-language look at the latest Form 990 figures available. These numbers help you ask better questions; they do not, by themselves, rate whether a charity is good or bad.

$100revenue

How each $100 of revenue was used

The large number compares each expense with revenue. The smaller number shows its share of total expenses.

Total reported revenue$594,301

Mission workProgram services$450,92275.87% of revenue69.0% of expenses

ManagementOffice and general costs$186,45231.37% of revenue28.5% of expenses

FundraisingAsking for donations$16,5152.78% of revenue2.5% of expenses

Total expenses$653,889110.03% of revenue

Expenses were greater than revenue, so the colored ring fills the available $100 and the total above 100% is shown below.

Has the pattern changed?

Colored bars = expense mix: how each year’s expenses were divided. Total expenses vs. revenue shows whether the charity spent less or more than it received. The current filing is first.

YearExpense mixDetails

2024CurrentExpense mix: 69.0% mission · 28.5% management · 2.5% fundraisingTotal expenses: 110.03% of revenue

2023Expense mix: 75.4% mission · 24.6% management · 0.0% fundraisingTotal expenses: 71.70% of revenue

2022Expense mix: 58.0% mission · 40.0% management · 2.0% fundraisingTotal expenses: 52.94% of revenue

2021Expense mix: 46.9% mission · 53.1% management · 0.1% fundraisingTotal expenses: 31.16% of revenue

2020Expense mix: 55.4% mission · 34.2% management · 10.4% fundraisingTotal expenses: 47.95% of revenue

2019Expense mix: 59.3% mission · 33.2% management · 7.5% fundraisingTotal expenses: 57.70% of revenue

2018Expense mix: 71.2% mission · 25.9% management · 2.9% fundraisingTotal expenses: 47.88% of revenue

2017Expense mix: 42.2% mission · 55.2% management · 2.6% fundraisingTotal expenses: 43.70% of revenue

Money in and money out

Revenue$870,562

Expenses$653,889

Annual surplus $216,673 Revenue was higher than expenses for this filing year.

Reported spending amounts

Mission work means the Form 990 category called program services. These are reported accounting categories—not an independent measurement of results.

Mission work (program services)$450,922 · 69.0% of expenses

Management and office costs$186,452 · 28.5% of expenses

Fundraising$16,515 · 2.5% of expenses

See all reported dollar amounts

Revenue$870,562

Expenses$653,889

Assets$8,636,732

Income$2,705,828

Contributions$192,849

Mission work (program services)$450,922

Fundraising$16,515

Grants given$1,596,815

Average grant$228,116

Management and general$186,452

Stocks and bonds$7,748,049

Accounting fees$22,100

Investing fees$53,842

People

Leadership and board

Tax year 2024

Names, titles, time, and compensation below are reported by the organization on its Form 990.

No compensation was reported for these leaders. The complete board and leadership roster is shown below.

Board and leadership roster (13)

ALAN P DYESECRETARY

AMANDA CRAWFORD STIFELTRUSTEE

CARL NOBLE RAETHERCFO/ TRUSTEE

ELIZABETH B ROBERTSVICE CHAIR

FREDERIC R KELLOGGTRUSTEE

JANE SLOAT RITCHIECHAIR

JOHN J MEDVECKISTRUSTEE

KATHLEEN F PATTERSONTRUSTEE

KATHRYN DONALDSON BAKERTRUSTEE

MARTHA DIPPELL KORENGOLDTRUSTEE

MARY MATTHEWS RAETHERTRUSTEE

SHANNON FAIRBANKSTRUSTEE

SHARON LEININGER NEMEROFFTRUSTEE

About this charity

Recognized since: January 1983
Location: 1747 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 1000, WASHINGTON, DC 20006-4636
County: District of Columbia
In care of: JANE SLOAT RITCHIE
Primary officer: JANE SLOAT RITCHIE, CHAIR

How to reach them

Phone(301) 215-7997

Filing and classification

Latest tax year: 2024
Tax period began: January 1, 2024
Return type: 990
Tax preparer: GELMAN ROSENBERG & FREEDMAN
NTEE classification: Arts, Culture & Humanities (A82Z)
IRS tax category: Other Grantmaking and Giving Services
Grant-giving organization: Yes